Fox News is singled out because they are the worst offender. You list one example of someone talking about “murder[ing]” the health care bill… wow. That’s hardly in the same league as talking about bashing someone’s head in with a baseball bat, poisoning Nancy Pelosi, spreading lies about death panels and organizing anti-government protests (but only when Democrats are in office). Much of what is posted on this site has to do with errors that are rarely, if ever, admitted by FNC. Beck took months to admit to his about Van Jones. The facts were out there – here w/in a day or two – but it took him months, and that was just one falsehood of many.

It’s amazing when people come here and post comments like yours, specifically this part: “it is the only news networks that I have noticed that almost always has conservative and liberal guests to discuss issues. The other cable networks rarely allow conservative viewpoints in their discussions and when they do invite a conservative the person is screamed down by the host or asked a series of questions and not allowed to answer the first question.” Your description fits Fox News to a tee. Either you severely mistyped, or you’ve never actually watched cable news. How many times have people on other networks cut off microphones, yelled at and hung up on callers, or acted like they were lighting someone on fire like FNC personalities have done? Other networks frequently oppose Obama’s policy changes and not keeping campaign promises, whereas FNC is the anti-Obama network. Murdoch and Ailes have made that abundantly clear that that is their intention. You are delusional to think that any other network is that blatantly biased.

I am not surprised however. The Fox News Boycott seems to want people to take action against Fox News for various reasons most notably the opinions of its hosts. If action should be taken against Fox for opinions that are unpopular to some, every cable news channel should be boycotted. For decades Americans had no choice or alternate selections to counter the bias of the mainstream media. There is a good reason that the “mainstream media” is sometimes referred to as the propaganda arm of the DNC. MSNBC airs more offensive, openly biased opinions than Fox News and all other cable news networks combined. When you hear a show host seriously state that voting for Scott Brown is deliberate, premeditated MURDER of the democrat’s health care bill. The person that made this statement has apparently lost touch with reality. A cable news host that takes a loss that personally is disturbed. Calling voters murderers is just a little bit over the top. However we hear nothing about boycotting disturbed and dangerous opinions from this network.

America has had to listen to liberal presentation of the news for decades. By the time Fox News started broadcasting an alternative view the left was so used to having it their way that they lost all composure when they had to hear the truth. In addition, you may not like Fox News but it is the only news networks that I have noticed that almost always has conservative and liberal guests to discuss issues. The other cable networks rarely allow conservative viewpoints in their discussions and when they do invite a conservative the person is screamed down by the host or asked a series of questions and not allowed to answer the first question. There is one network and host that seems to be especially proud of their reputation.

As an example of Mr. Beck’s use of the EXACT tactics.
BECK:
“Tonight, we ask the question, ‘If Barack HUSSEIN Obama is REALLY a natural-born citizen of the United States, why doesn’t he just provide a copy of his birth certificate?’ Mr. Obama’s citizenship has been questioned by Orley Taits — among others — and STILL he refuses to provide a certified copy of his original birth certificate. On top of that, Mr. Obama seems completely oblivious to the concerns of these people that the left-wing media machine have dubbed ‘Birthers’.
“If Mr. Obama would address the issue, and provide evidence to the people of this country that he is truly an American citizen by birth, then the controversy would be put to rest. His refusal to do so gives the appearance that he has something to hide.
“What could Mr. Obama — a man running for the office of President of the United States of America — what could he possibly have to hide about his birth that would force him to avoid this critical issue?”

Now, do you see how this is EXACTLY the same tactic? Therein lies the satire, the parody, and the humor. Mr. Beck is being lambasted with his own techniques and he is simmering about it. He has filed lawsuits, he has sent threatening letters, but he has stolidly REFUSED to give the issue a voice BECAUSE it will only lend validity to the claims. In this case, Mr. Beck is doing the same thing that President Obama did when confronted with equally absurd statements; nothing.

Oh, and just so it can’t be said that I never addressed the issue in a public forum, “I have never murdered or raped or murdered and raped or raped and murdered anyone.”

Are we clear now?

Interesting!

May I point out that there is a little flaw that would make a Beck apologizer deny the scenario you put forth. Since rape is sex against one’s will, and a dead person cannot refuse sex,a denial of Glenn Beck murdering then raping would be inherently true.

Which brings the concept of necrophillia into the picture. Now, I’m not saying Glenn Beck murdered a girl then had his way with her, finding a dead girl or hiding in funeral home after a wake are also ways that an opportunist might carry out necrophilia.

I’ve heard many call Glenn Beck, “an opportunist”.

You may be on to something.