Dana Perino Rewrites 9/11 History on Hannity


Posted by FoxNewsBoycott on Wednesday, November 25th, 2009
Filed under Sean Hannity

White House Press Secretary under George W. Bush and current Fox News contributor Dana Perino needs a history lesson on 9/11. While trying to classify the Ft. Hood shooting as a terrorist attack, Perino makes the crazy assertion that “we did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush’s term.”

With the new “zero tolerance” policy for errors, Sean Hannity surely corrected Perino, right? Wrong.

PERINO: And we had a terrorist attack on our country. And we should call it what it is. Because we need to face up to it so that we can prevent it from happening again.

HANNITY: I agree with you. And why won’t they say what you just so simply said?

PERINO: They want to do all of their investigations. I don’t know. All of the thinking that goes into it. But we did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush’s term. I hope they’re not looking at this politically. I do think we ought it to the American people to call it what it is.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Post to Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Tucker Carlson & Dana Perino Join Fox News Former MSNBC conservative political pundit, Tucker Carlson, and White House...
  2. Sean Hannity Needs Fannie/Freddie History Lesson Apparently, Sean Hannity has forgotten that George W. Bush was...
  3. Dana Perino’s Hypocrisy Re: FNC vs. White House Fox News contributor Dana Perino, who is the former White...
  4. Jon Stewart Schools Sean Hannity on History & Food Chain Sean Hannity, in California, spoke about the drought conditions for...
  5. Sean Hannity Lies About Clinton Op-Ed Before George W. Bush took office, according to Sean Hannity,...

This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 25th, 2009 and is filed under Sean Hannity. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “Dana Perino Rewrites 9/11 History on Hannity”

  1. BRIAN on November 25th, 2009 at 11:33 am

    Sept.11,2001,Dana? Who was President who ignored 50 warnings about 9/11,Dana?

  2. Crowdaddy13 on November 30th, 2009 at 9:14 am

    Well and if you consider a shooting like this a “terrorist” attack, then what about the DC snipers, the Virginia Tech shooting and the others? I’ve even heard fox news say that there were no terrorist attacks after 9/11 because of Bush’s security measures (they were also talking about our allies too)………..what about the train bombings in the UK and Spain. I mean, Fox News are full of liars and the people that watch and believe it are ignorant. Read a history book, do some homework, study…..come on morons

  3. Marbran on December 22nd, 2009 at 12:58 pm

    Why does the left always resort to name-calling? Every site I visit that contains leftist ideologues is always peppered with derisive comments. Do you think that debasing a group of people using names makes you smarter, or more important, or more right? I don’t appreciate it on the right, either. Ad hominem attacks never win arguments.

    Back to Dana…he should probably stick to using a teleprompter to avoid misspeaking.

  4. FoxNewsBoycott on December 22nd, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    Marbran, That’s quite a generalization. A frequent internal debate is in regards to hate mail. If I posted that, many people would say the same thing about Fox News fans.

  5. Marbran on December 23rd, 2009 at 6:09 am

    What is a generalization? The derisive comments? Visit DU any day or hour of the week and you’ll see what I mean. And I also said that it happens on the conservative sites, as well. Freepers can be just as jejune.

  6. Sam on January 29th, 2010 at 2:47 pm

    Hertiage Foundation’s (a conservative think-tank) 2007 report discredits This falsehood even more. http://www.heritage.org/Research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm

  7. Marbran on January 31st, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    @Sam

    Next time, could you add a little more perspective when you post a particular link? I’m certain you had some thoughts on the Heritage Foundation’s report, but simply linking it here doesn’t give us your perspective, other than your disagreement with Perino’s statement. Just a thought…

Leave a Reply

Attention: Comments are moderated. Off topic rants, personal attacks, harassment, etc. will not be published. See the Comment Policy and F.A.Q. for more information.


Subscribe without commenting



Donate to FoxNewsBoycott.com

Get Updates Via Email

Enter your email address:

Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Recent Comments

Tags

Tag Cloud


Latest Tweets



Support Our Sponsors

Newspaper subscription Zinio.com - Digital Magazines, Save up to 90%